Difference between revisions of "Talk:CH391L/S14/Genome Synthesis"
From SynBioCyc
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*--[[User:Dennis Mishler|Dennis Mishler]] ([[User talk:Dennis Mishler|talk]]) 12:14, 5 February 2014 (CST)Drew, where did your first figure come from? And your 3rd figure? It also needs a legend. | *--[[User:Dennis Mishler|Dennis Mishler]] ([[User talk:Dennis Mishler|talk]]) 12:14, 5 February 2014 (CST)Drew, where did your first figure come from? And your 3rd figure? It also needs a legend. | ||
+ | |||
+ | *--[[User:Dennis Mishler|Dennis Mishler]] ([[User talk:Dennis Mishler|talk]]) 12:20, 5 February 2014 (CST) Drew, as Jeff mentioned in class, wasn't there an early study that synthesized the Polio genome? I would include a mention of this and relate it to "dual use" research... a topic which we will cover later in the semester. |
Revision as of 18:20, 5 February 2014
- --Ella Watkins (talk) 18:35, 3 February 2014 (CST) Not sure if supposed to say "assembly" rather than "assemble" in technology section on fifth row down... just a typo? Also label the last figure, where does it go with? And if you can fix the "1. that goes under the 2." in the early work section and make it a bullet, that would make it easier to read. Sorry to nitpick, your wiki is just so good I can't see anything else!
- --Dennis Mishler (talk) 12:14, 5 February 2014 (CST)Drew, where did your first figure come from? And your 3rd figure? It also needs a legend.
- --Dennis Mishler (talk) 12:20, 5 February 2014 (CST) Drew, as Jeff mentioned in class, wasn't there an early study that synthesized the Polio genome? I would include a mention of this and relate it to "dual use" research... a topic which we will cover later in the semester.