Difference between revisions of "Talk:CH391L/S14/Bioremediation&caffeinatedcoli"
(Created page with "*--~~~~ The grammar in the bioattenuation section needs to be improved. In a couple of places throughout the article you use "nature" instead of "natural" "in its nature sta...") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*--[[User:Dennis Mishler|Dennis Mishler]] ([[User talk:Dennis Mishler|talk]]) 17:15, 14 April 2014 (CDT) Good use of examples and covering the potential modes of bioremediation. I would like to know more about the "natural" bioremediation... what types of bacteria are used? What are the relevant pathways? | *--[[User:Dennis Mishler|Dennis Mishler]] ([[User talk:Dennis Mishler|talk]]) 17:15, 14 April 2014 (CDT) Good use of examples and covering the potential modes of bioremediation. I would like to know more about the "natural" bioremediation... what types of bacteria are used? What are the relevant pathways? | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | --[[User:Dennis Mishler|Dennis Mishler]] ([[User talk:Dennis Mishler|talk]]) 17:12, 17 April 2014 (CDT)* Nathan's wiki critique | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Overall Format and structure: ''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Nice layout, practical and generally easy to follow. There were many examples of bioremediation discussed and this wiki discussed an extensive breadth regarding the topic. Overall, the wiki seemed very focused and structured. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Introduction and background material:''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | The introduction to this wiki was very succinct and precise. It gave a clear overview of the topics that were to be discussed in greater detail later in the wiki. I was able to understand the general underlying concept of bioremediation simply by reading the introduction. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Methods and main body/concepts:''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | The descriptions of the different methods were good. They gave a thorough description of what the methods entailed and how it worked. However, I think it would be beneficial to the readers if you gave real examples of how these methods of bioremediation are being used around the world. Perhaps discussing how well each method works and sharing success stories would help this wiki. Also, I think it would have been helpful to discuss the future direction of bioremediation and the problems that must be overcome. Lastly, I would like to have seen how microorganisms help increase efficiency and biocompatability of the plants. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Relation to iGEM and future directions:''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | There wasn't much about the future direction of bioremediation. I think an additional section focusing on the future of this topic would be beneficial. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Figures, Figure legends, and citations:''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | The figures were very helpful in understanding the topics that were discussed. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
Revision as of 22:12, 17 April 2014
- --Dennis Mishler (talk) 17:15, 14 April 2014 (CDT) The grammar in the bioattenuation section needs to be improved. In a couple of places throughout the article you use "nature" instead of "natural" "in its nature state" should be "in its natural state"... (phytoremediation)
- --Dennis Mishler (talk) 17:15, 14 April 2014 (CDT) Good use of examples and covering the potential modes of bioremediation. I would like to know more about the "natural" bioremediation... what types of bacteria are used? What are the relevant pathways?
--Dennis Mishler (talk) 17:12, 17 April 2014 (CDT)* Nathan's wiki critique
Overall Format and structure:
Nice layout, practical and generally easy to follow. There were many examples of bioremediation discussed and this wiki discussed an extensive breadth regarding the topic. Overall, the wiki seemed very focused and structured.
Introduction and background material:
The introduction to this wiki was very succinct and precise. It gave a clear overview of the topics that were to be discussed in greater detail later in the wiki. I was able to understand the general underlying concept of bioremediation simply by reading the introduction.
Methods and main body/concepts:
The descriptions of the different methods were good. They gave a thorough description of what the methods entailed and how it worked. However, I think it would be beneficial to the readers if you gave real examples of how these methods of bioremediation are being used around the world. Perhaps discussing how well each method works and sharing success stories would help this wiki. Also, I think it would have been helpful to discuss the future direction of bioremediation and the problems that must be overcome. Lastly, I would like to have seen how microorganisms help increase efficiency and biocompatability of the plants.
Relation to iGEM and future directions:
There wasn't much about the future direction of bioremediation. I think an additional section focusing on the future of this topic would be beneficial.
Figures, Figure legends, and citations:
The figures were very helpful in understanding the topics that were discussed.
