Difference between revisions of "Talk:CH391L/S14/CAD systems"
From SynBioCyc
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*--[[User:Ew6977|Ew6977]] ([[User talk:Ew6977|talk]]) 15:48, 30 January 2014 (CST) In introduction, consider capitalizing the first letter of the 3 steps, this is just a formatting suggestion | *--[[User:Ew6977|Ew6977]] ([[User talk:Ew6977|talk]]) 15:48, 30 January 2014 (CST) In introduction, consider capitalizing the first letter of the 3 steps, this is just a formatting suggestion | ||
*--[[User:Ew6977|Ew6977]] ([[User talk:Ew6977|talk]]) 16:01, 30 January 2014 (CST) I think that there is some valuable information that you included in your slideshow that I do not see in the Wiki. Your tinkercell information was very detailed in the presentation, but there is very little information in the wiki. I think including that the Tinkercell program can have added downloadable content as well as providing a picture of the tinkercell interface would add some valuable information for future readers. | *--[[User:Ew6977|Ew6977]] ([[User talk:Ew6977|talk]]) 16:01, 30 January 2014 (CST) I think that there is some valuable information that you included in your slideshow that I do not see in the Wiki. Your tinkercell information was very detailed in the presentation, but there is very little information in the wiki. I think including that the Tinkercell program can have added downloadable content as well as providing a picture of the tinkercell interface would add some valuable information for future readers. | ||
| + | *--[[User:Ajv684|Ajv684]] ([[User talk:Ajv684|talk]]) 21:58, 30 January 2014 (CST) I found the wiki page very thorough and in general well laid out. I would suggest that depending on the target reader, that might probably be a lay reader with almost no previous knowledge on the topic, it would be great to simplify it quite some. Also, I was personally more interested in tinker cell and I would've liked to see more detailed information about it in here. | ||
Revision as of 04:00, 31 January 2014
- --Dennis Mishler (talk) 13:46, 28 January 2014 (CST) Gabo, the Snapgene description needs to be checked for grammar.
- --Dennis Mishler (talk) 13:46, 28 January 2014 (CST) Gabo, the "standardizing representation of synthetic biology design" section is a bit confusing. What is the purpose of this section? Was there a bigger issue within the field that needed addressing? If so, perhaps the section should start by identifying this issue or need. If this section refers to how certain objects stand for certain parts (like a promoter, RBS, etc...), this should be explicitly stated.
- --Ew6977 (talk) 15:48, 30 January 2014 (CST) In introduction, consider capitalizing the first letter of the 3 steps, this is just a formatting suggestion
- --Ew6977 (talk) 16:01, 30 January 2014 (CST) I think that there is some valuable information that you included in your slideshow that I do not see in the Wiki. Your tinkercell information was very detailed in the presentation, but there is very little information in the wiki. I think including that the Tinkercell program can have added downloadable content as well as providing a picture of the tinkercell interface would add some valuable information for future readers.
- --Ajv684 (talk) 21:58, 30 January 2014 (CST) I found the wiki page very thorough and in general well laid out. I would suggest that depending on the target reader, that might probably be a lay reader with almost no previous knowledge on the topic, it would be great to simplify it quite some. Also, I was personally more interested in tinker cell and I would've liked to see more detailed information about it in here.
