Difference between revisions of "Talk:CH391L/S14/Genome Synthesis"

From SynBioCyc
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
--[[User:Ew6977|Ella Watkins ]] ([[User talk:Ew6977|talk]]) 18:35, 3 February 2014 (CST) Not sure if supposed to say "assembly" rather than "assemble" in technology section on fifth row down... just a typo? Also label the last figure, where does it go with? And if you can fix the "1. that goes under the 2." in the early work section and make it a bullet, that would make it easier to read. Sorry to nitpick, your wiki is just so good I can't see anything else!
+
*--[[User:Ew6977|Ella Watkins ]] ([[User talk:Ew6977|talk]]) 18:35, 3 February 2014 (CST) Not sure if supposed to say "assembly" rather than "assemble" in technology section on fifth row down... just a typo? Also label the last figure, where does it go with? And if you can fix the "1. that goes under the 2." in the early work section and make it a bullet, that would make it easier to read. Sorry to nitpick, your wiki is just so good I can't see anything else!
--[[User:Dst465|drewtack]] ([[User talk:Dst465|talk]]) 10:34, 4 February 2014 (CST)Oh stop it you're making me blush!  I agree with all three of your suggestions and have made, in my opinion, appropriate adjustments.  Thanks for the feedback.
+
**--[[User:Dst465|drewtack]] ([[User talk:Dst465|talk]]) 10:34, 4 February 2014 (CST)Oh stop it you're making me blush!  I agree with all three of your suggestions and have made, in my opinion, appropriate adjustments.  Thanks for the feedback.
 +
 
 +
*--[[User:Dennis Mishler|Dennis Mishler]] ([[User talk:Dennis Mishler|talk]]) 12:14, 5 February 2014 (CST)Drew, where did your first figure come from?  And your 3rd figure?  It also needs a legend.

Revision as of 18:14, 5 February 2014

  • --Ella Watkins (talk) 18:35, 3 February 2014 (CST) Not sure if supposed to say "assembly" rather than "assemble" in technology section on fifth row down... just a typo? Also label the last figure, where does it go with? And if you can fix the "1. that goes under the 2." in the early work section and make it a bullet, that would make it easier to read. Sorry to nitpick, your wiki is just so good I can't see anything else!
    • --drewtack (talk) 10:34, 4 February 2014 (CST)Oh stop it you're making me blush! I agree with all three of your suggestions and have made, in my opinion, appropriate adjustments. Thanks for the feedback.
  • --Dennis Mishler (talk) 12:14, 5 February 2014 (CST)Drew, where did your first figure come from? And your 3rd figure? It also needs a legend.