Difference between revisions of "Talk:CH391L/S14/MotilityandTaxis"
From SynBioCyc
(Created page with "*~~~~ Has anyone engineered a different type of motility (for example, cilia, gliding motility, pseudopodia)? *~~~~ In your update, give us the highlights of the studies desc...") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*[[User:Jeffrey Barrick|Jeffrey Barrick]] ([[User talk:Jeffrey Barrick|talk]]) 15:03, 17 March 2014 (CDT) In your update, give us the highlights of the studies described here: http://2012.igem.org/Team:Goettingen/Notebook/Results | *[[User:Jeffrey Barrick|Jeffrey Barrick]] ([[User talk:Jeffrey Barrick|talk]]) 15:03, 17 March 2014 (CDT) In your update, give us the highlights of the studies described here: http://2012.igem.org/Team:Goettingen/Notebook/Results | ||
| + | |||
| + | *--[[User:Dennis Mishler|Dennis Mishler]] ([[User talk:Dennis Mishler|talk]]) 17:07, 18 March 2014 (CDT) Jorge, regarding your figures, I find some of the legends confusing. For example, in figure 1, it refers to "a" and "b", and while there does appear to be two distinct panels or illustrations, there is no "a" or "b". Perhaps simply "on the left" and "on the right"? In Figure 2, I would change your figure+legend. If someone doesn't know what a Histidine Kinase is, that figure is going to be too confusing with the legend there. I say this because the domains are colored differently, yet are the same protein. In general, you have very complex figures with lots of parts. It may be worthwhile to consider simplifying them, or altering the figures a bit, or expanding upon the explanations. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *--[[User:Dennis Mishler|Dennis Mishler]] ([[User talk:Dennis Mishler|talk]]) 17:07, 18 March 2014 (CDT) Table 1 needs to be reformatted to fit into the page. | ||
Revision as of 22:07, 18 March 2014
- Jeffrey Barrick (talk) 15:03, 17 March 2014 (CDT) Has anyone engineered a different type of motility (for example, cilia, gliding motility, pseudopodia)?
- Jeffrey Barrick (talk) 15:03, 17 March 2014 (CDT) In your update, give us the highlights of the studies described here: http://2012.igem.org/Team:Goettingen/Notebook/Results
- --Dennis Mishler (talk) 17:07, 18 March 2014 (CDT) Jorge, regarding your figures, I find some of the legends confusing. For example, in figure 1, it refers to "a" and "b", and while there does appear to be two distinct panels or illustrations, there is no "a" or "b". Perhaps simply "on the left" and "on the right"? In Figure 2, I would change your figure+legend. If someone doesn't know what a Histidine Kinase is, that figure is going to be too confusing with the legend there. I say this because the domains are colored differently, yet are the same protein. In general, you have very complex figures with lots of parts. It may be worthwhile to consider simplifying them, or altering the figures a bit, or expanding upon the explanations.
- --Dennis Mishler (talk) 17:07, 18 March 2014 (CDT) Table 1 needs to be reformatted to fit into the page.
