Difference between revisions of "Talk:CH391L/S14/Non-canonical Nucleotides"
From SynBioCyc
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
*--[[User:Dennis Mishler|Dennis Mishler]] ([[User talk:Dennis Mishler|talk]]) 08:17, 4 March 2014 (CST) I think the "Rich" you are referring to may be Alex Rich [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Rich], but I may be wrong. This was whom I referred to in class, although I said "Alan". | *--[[User:Dennis Mishler|Dennis Mishler]] ([[User talk:Dennis Mishler|talk]]) 08:17, 4 March 2014 (CST) I think the "Rich" you are referring to may be Alex Rich [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Rich], but I may be wrong. This was whom I referred to in class, although I said "Alan". | ||
*--[[User:Chen-Hsun Tsai|Chen-Hsun Tsai]] ([[User talk:Chen-Hsun Tsai|talk]]) 08:23, 7 March 2014 (CST) I think some references can be added to the Future section, like the work of Steven Benner. | *--[[User:Chen-Hsun Tsai|Chen-Hsun Tsai]] ([[User talk:Chen-Hsun Tsai|talk]]) 08:23, 7 March 2014 (CST) I think some references can be added to the Future section, like the work of Steven Benner. | ||
+ | **--[[User:Dst465|drewtack]] ([[User talk:Dst465|talk]]) 10:43, 17 March 2014 (CDT)I'll look into this. | ||
*--[[User:Ajv684|Jorge Vazquez ]] ([[User talk:Ajv684|talk]]) 09:23, 14 March 2014 (CDT)Great job here as well! Clear wording and easy to read. However, I find the first paragraph in section "Original Proposal and Experimental Validation" a bit confusing, mostly the second sentence, I am not sure what you mean by not observed in nature but then that they have been seen. Also, I would've liked to see a bit more about applications. | *--[[User:Ajv684|Jorge Vazquez ]] ([[User talk:Ajv684|talk]]) 09:23, 14 March 2014 (CDT)Great job here as well! Clear wording and easy to read. However, I find the first paragraph in section "Original Proposal and Experimental Validation" a bit confusing, mostly the second sentence, I am not sure what you mean by not observed in nature but then that they have been seen. Also, I would've liked to see a bit more about applications. | ||
**--[[User:Dst465|drewtack]] ([[User talk:Dst465|talk]]) 10:40, 17 March 2014 (CDT)Tried to fix the section you mentioned, agreed that it was a little confusing. will work on applications. | **--[[User:Dst465|drewtack]] ([[User talk:Dst465|talk]]) 10:40, 17 March 2014 (CDT)Tried to fix the section you mentioned, agreed that it was a little confusing. will work on applications. |
Latest revision as of 15:43, 17 March 2014
- --Dennis Mishler (talk) 08:17, 4 March 2014 (CST) Same issue with figures... cite, if needed, include a legend.
- --Dennis Mishler (talk) 08:17, 4 March 2014 (CST) I think the "Rich" you are referring to may be Alex Rich [1], but I may be wrong. This was whom I referred to in class, although I said "Alan".
- --Chen-Hsun Tsai (talk) 08:23, 7 March 2014 (CST) I think some references can be added to the Future section, like the work of Steven Benner.
- --Jorge Vazquez (talk) 09:23, 14 March 2014 (CDT)Great job here as well! Clear wording and easy to read. However, I find the first paragraph in section "Original Proposal and Experimental Validation" a bit confusing, mostly the second sentence, I am not sure what you mean by not observed in nature but then that they have been seen. Also, I would've liked to see a bit more about applications.