Talk:CH391L/S14/SmallRNAs
From SynBioCyc
- --Dennis Mishler (talk) 08:13, 9 April 2014 (CDT) Jorge, there are a few grammar/typos located throughout the article. In particular, the introduction and the "sRNAs in metabolic engineering" were sections where the errors interfered with my understanding of the section.
- --Dennis Mishler (talk) 08:13, 9 April 2014 (CDT) Also, since you have written a review on this topic (ref #4), make sure you are not "self-plagiarizing" anywhere in the article. Make any quotes from that article very obvious, and keep them to a minimum. Remember, this includes verbatim copying as well as copying with minor changes.
- --Dennis Mishler (talk) 08:13, 9 April 2014 (CDT) I would like to see a future directions sections that expands on current work and possible future work. From your wiki article, I don't have a full appreciation of how commonly this methodology is being currently used... are there other current examples?
- You provide a nice table, but you don't really describe these works. At least a couple of them should be addressed in either the "current research" or "future directions" sections.
--Ella Watkins (talk) 11:59, 10 April 2014 (CDT) "In addition, sRNA capacity to simultaneously multiple genes has enabled the vision of sRNAs as a powerful tool for metabolic engineering applications. Hereby I will focus on a specific type of sRNA and its presence in synthetic biology." The bolded part, I am not sure if it is supposed to say multiply?
