Difference between revisions of "Talk:CH391L/S14/Spinach RNA"
From SynBioCyc
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
--[[User:Dennis Mishler|Dennis Mishler]] ([[User talk:Dennis Mishler|talk]]) 08:06, 4 March 2014 (CST) Drew, figures need citations and legends. The formatting looks a bit odd for them. | --[[User:Dennis Mishler|Dennis Mishler]] ([[User talk:Dennis Mishler|talk]]) 08:06, 4 March 2014 (CST) Drew, figures need citations and legends. The formatting looks a bit odd for them. | ||
*--[[User:Dst465|drewtack]] ([[User talk:Dst465|talk]]) 12:18, 4 March 2014 (CST)Yeah Dennis, I meant to ask you about that, I couldn't get the figure boxes or captions to show up. I figured it out, the images were not marked as thumbs, which is essential for the captions to appear. | *--[[User:Dst465|drewtack]] ([[User talk:Dst465|talk]]) 12:18, 4 March 2014 (CST)Yeah Dennis, I meant to ask you about that, I couldn't get the figure boxes or captions to show up. I figured it out, the images were not marked as thumbs, which is essential for the captions to appear. | ||
| + | **--[[User:Mdf889|Mindy]] ([[User talk:Mdf889|talk]]) 21:05, 6 March 2014 (CST) Hey great job on thoroughness, the only suggestion I would have is to use bold or links to pages to highlight key terms. This might break up paragraphs and enable the reader to pick out the most important parts. Other than that, the reference section had nice succinct descriptors, and overall it seemed to adequately cover the material. :) | ||
Revision as of 03:05, 7 March 2014
--Dennis Mishler (talk) 08:06, 4 March 2014 (CST) Drew, figures need citations and legends. The formatting looks a bit odd for them.
- --drewtack (talk) 12:18, 4 March 2014 (CST)Yeah Dennis, I meant to ask you about that, I couldn't get the figure boxes or captions to show up. I figured it out, the images were not marked as thumbs, which is essential for the captions to appear.
- --Mindy (talk) 21:05, 6 March 2014 (CST) Hey great job on thoroughness, the only suggestion I would have is to use bold or links to pages to highlight key terms. This might break up paragraphs and enable the reader to pick out the most important parts. Other than that, the reference section had nice succinct descriptors, and overall it seemed to adequately cover the material. :)
