Difference between revisions of "Talk:CH391L/S14/ApplicationsofOptogenetics"
From SynBioCyc
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*--[[User:Dennis Mishler|Dennis Mishler]] ([[User talk:Dennis Mishler|talk]]) 17:22, 18 March 2014 (CDT) "Harlorhodopsin" in "epileptiform" section. | *--[[User:Dennis Mishler|Dennis Mishler]] ([[User talk:Dennis Mishler|talk]]) 17:22, 18 March 2014 (CDT) "Harlorhodopsin" in "epileptiform" section. | ||
| + | |||
| + | *----[[User:Ajv684|Jorge Vazquez ]] ([[User talk:Ajv684|talk]]) 20:58, 20 March 2014 (CDT)Awesome job! I really liked it. I think is well laid out and it is very well written. Sections about examples are detailed and there is direct links to extended information. I would've liked to read more about potential applications, it is still not very obvious to me. | ||
Revision as of 01:58, 21 March 2014
- Jeffrey Barrick (talk) 15:11, 17 March 2014 (CDT) Can you give us examples of what organisms the genes for the channel rhodopsins and halorhodopsins come from?
- Jeffrey Barrick (talk) 15:11, 17 March 2014 (CDT) Some people had questions about the physical machinery for illuminating neurons in the brains of living mice. How does that work?
- --Dennis Mishler (talk) 17:22, 18 March 2014 (CDT)Ella, figures are missing a legend/citation. Could be the coding.
- --Dennis Mishler (talk) 17:22, 18 March 2014 (CDT)A simple figure for "how was this system made?" Ella, if there is a simplistic figure showing what you describe in this section, I think that would be a nice addition. And I think it is important that everyone understand how this system was made.
- --Dennis Mishler (talk) 17:22, 18 March 2014 (CDT) "Harlorhodopsin" in "epileptiform" section.
- ----Jorge Vazquez (talk) 20:58, 20 March 2014 (CDT)Awesome job! I really liked it. I think is well laid out and it is very well written. Sections about examples are detailed and there is direct links to extended information. I would've liked to read more about potential applications, it is still not very obvious to me.
